lexeagle Archives - Page 4 of 7 - Gogia Litigation Group

Love or Lies? When a Live-In Relationship Ended Up in Supreme Court.

Neeraj Gogia May 7, 2025 No Comments

RAVISH SINGH RANA .… APPELLANT(S) Versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S) From Facebook to Courtroom: A Love Story Gone Wrong What began as a casual Facebook connection in…

crpc district court high court mens rea negligence petition summons supreme court trial court witness writ

Beyond the Alibi: A Court’s Duty to See the Human Story. Section 319 CrPc & beyond.

Neeraj Gogia May 7, 2025 No Comments

Starting from the start In the quiet village of Jagowal, Punjab, a tragedy unfolded that would test the boundaries of legal interpretation and the resilience of a grieving father’s quest…

copyright Delhi High court infringement intellectual property law legal lex eagle notice summons trademark

Champak vs. BCCI: Children’s Magazine Takes Legal Action Against IPL’s AI Robot Dog Name

Neeraj Gogia May 7, 2025 No Comments

Champak vs. BCCI: Trademark Battle Over IPL Robot Dog Name Reaches Delhi High Court Case Introduction In a significant intellectual property dispute, Delhi High Court Justice Saurabh Banerjee has issued…

consumer facts GST high court law legal lex eagle mens rea notice summons supreme court writ

How a Small Business in Bihar Fought Back Against a Crorepati Tax Notice – And Won.

Neeraj Gogia May 4, 2025 No Comments

M/s Sri Sai Food Grain … Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar … Respondent Story Starts When the taxmen came knocking at Gyanti Devi’s modest food grains store in rural…

appeal application copyright Delhi High court infringement intellectual property law legal lex eagle summons trademark

DavidoffWins: Delhi HC Restores Luxury Brand’s Trademark in Landmark Ruling Against Registry Lapses.

Neeraj Gogia May 4, 2025 No Comments

M/S ZINE DAVIDOFF S.A. …..Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR …..Respondent Date of the order:- 22.4.2025 The Delhi High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in M/s Zine Davidoff…

bank bounced cheque compensation Delhi High court high court law legal lex eagle summons

J K & Ladakh High Court Rules Minor Error in Cheque Bounce Notice Doesn’t Defeat Justice: ₹21 Lakh Case to Proceed.

Neeraj Gogia May 4, 2025 No Comments

Pawan Kumar …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Versus Ranbir Singh .….Respondent(s) Date of Order:-02.05.2025 The Cheque Bounce Dispute in Detail The case began when Ranbir Singh approached the court after two cheques issued by…

appeal application bounced cheque damages delhi Delhi High court Freedom of speech high court law legal lex eagle supreme court

Not My Signature, Not My Problem!” – Supreme Court Saves Non-Signatory Director in Cheque Bouncing Case.

Neeraj Gogia May 2, 2025 No Comments

HITESH VERMA ……APPELLANT Versus M/S HEALTH CARE AT HOME INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. …..RESPONDENT(S) Case BackgroundThe Supreme Court of India addressed multiple criminal appeals (Nos. 462-468 of 2025) arising…

appeal cheque delhi Delhi High court director high court law legal lex eagle summons supreme court

Directors Shielded: Delhi HC Rules No Personal Liability Without Proof in Export Violations

Neeraj Gogia May 2, 2025 No Comments

Delhi High Court Clarifies Director Liability in Export Violation Cases ANAND MEHTA …..Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE …..Respondent In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court held that…

damages delhi Delhi High court high court infringement intellectual property law legal lex eagle protection summons trademark

‘BOROLINE’ Triumphs: Delhi HC Declares 95-Year-Old Brand a ‘Well-Known Trademark’, Bans ‘BOROBEAUTY’.

Neeraj Gogia May 1, 2025 No Comments

G.D. PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED …..Plaintiff Versus M/S CENTO PRODUCTS (INDIA) …..Defendant Date of the order:-07.08.2024 Landmark Judgment Upholds Legacy Brand’s RightsIn a decisive victory for heritage brands, the Delhi High…

copyright delhi Delhi High court high court infringement intellectual property law legal lex eagle trademark

AQUAGUARD Wins Big: Court Slams Counterfeiters with ₹2 Lakh Fine in Landmark Trademark Case.

Neeraj Gogia April 30, 2025 No Comments

EUREKA FORBES LIMITED (FORMERLY FORBES ENVIROSOLUTIONS LIMITED) …..Plaintiff Versus OM SAI ENTERPRISES AND ORS …..Defendants Date of Order :- 04.03.2025 The Battle Against FakesEureka Forbes Limited, makers of the iconic…

lexeagle

Beyond the Alibi: A Court’s Duty to See the Human Story. Section 319 CrPc & beyond.

Champak vs. BCCI: Children’s Magazine Takes Legal Action Against IPL’s AI Robot Dog Name

How a Small Business in Bihar Fought Back Against a Crorepati Tax Notice – And Won.

DavidoffWins: Delhi HC Restores Luxury Brand’s Trademark in Landmark Ruling Against Registry Lapses.

J K & Ladakh High Court Rules Minor Error in Cheque Bounce Notice Doesn’t Defeat Justice: ₹21 Lakh Case to Proceed.

Not My Signature, Not My Problem!” – Supreme Court Saves Non-Signatory Director in Cheque Bouncing Case.

Directors Shielded: Delhi HC Rules No Personal Liability Without Proof in Export Violations

‘BOROLINE’ Triumphs: Delhi HC Declares 95-Year-Old Brand a ‘Well-Known Trademark’, Bans ‘BOROBEAUTY’.

AQUAGUARD Wins Big: Court Slams Counterfeiters with ₹2 Lakh Fine in Landmark Trademark Case.

You Missed

Right to Self-Defence Upheld: SC Acquits Doctor Who Shot Armed Attacker in his own Clinic.

No Cheating u/s 420 IPC, If No One Is Tricked: SC Quashes Case Over Fake Fire NOC.

Landlord, tenant, agreement and the law.

Corporate Strife, Forgery Allegations, and the Finality of Judicial Orders.